Cocaine Histories and Diverging Drug War Politics in Bolivia, Colombia, and Peru

Autores/as

  • Paul Gootenberg Stony Brook University

Palabras clave:

Keywords, Cocaine, Coca Leaf, Drug Policy, Drug War, Bolivia, Colombia, Peru Cocaine, Peru

Resumen

 

 

 This essay in comparative history examines the political responses rising across the Andes in the wake of cocaine’s current “shift south” away from the U.S.-Colombian axis that drove the hemispheric “drug war” of the last four decades.  Bolivia’s response is analyzed as the nationalist “coca si, cocaine no” control strategy; Colombia’s response as a state-building quest for sustainable “post-drug war” control; and Peru’s (once again the top exporter of illicit cocaine) as a politically passive “cocaine denial.”  In synthetic comparisons, these trajectories, rather than just reflect the “failures” or local born costs of the U.S. war against cocaine, relate to distinctive longer historical relationships to both coca leaf and illicit cocaine in each Andean nation, and the social, political, and racial geographies left by cocaine histories.       

Biografía del autor/a

Paul Gootenberg, Stony Brook University

Chair of History; SUNY Distinguished Professor of History & Sociology

Descargas

Publicado

2017-10-30

Cómo citar

Gootenberg, P. (2017). Cocaine Histories and Diverging Drug War Politics in Bolivia, Colombia, and Peru. A Contracorriente: Una Revista De Estudios Latinoamericanos, 15(1), 1–35. Recuperado a partir de https://acontracorriente.chass.ncsu.edu/index.php/acontracorriente/article/view/1610

Número

Sección

Artículos / Articles